<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zabala, a</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pons, X.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Effects of lossy compression on remote sensing image classification of forest areas</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forestry management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image classiﬁcation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image compression</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JPEG</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JPEG 2000</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0303243410000693</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43 - 51</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lossy compression is being increasingly used in remote sensing; however, its effects on classiﬁcation have scarcely been studied. This paper studies the implications of JPEG (JPG) and JPEG 2000 (J2K) lossy compression for image classiﬁcation of forests in Mediterranean areas. Results explore the impact of the compression on the images themselves as well as on the obtained classiﬁcation. The results indicate that classiﬁcations made with previously compressed radiometrically corrected images and topoclimatic variables are not negatively affected by compression, even at quite high compression ratios. Indeed, JPG compression can be applied to images at a compression ratio (CR, ratio between the size of the original ﬁle and the size of the compressed ﬁle) of 10:1 or even 20:1 (for both JPG and J2K). Nevertheless, the fragmentation of the study area must be taken into account: in less fragmented zones, high CR are possible for both JPG and J2K, but in fragmented zones, JPG is not advisable, and when J2K is used, only a medium CR is recommended (3.33:1 to 5:1). Taking into account that J2K produces fewer artefacts at higher CR, the study not only contributes with optimum CR recommendations, but also found that the J2K compression standard (ISO 15444-1) is better than the JPG (ISO 10918-1) when applied to image classiﬁcation. Although J2K is computationally more expensive, this is no longer a critical issue with current computer technology.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The following values have no corresponding Zotero field:&lt;br/&gt;publisher: Elsevier B.V.</style></notes></record></records></xml>