<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monteiro, Ana C G</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gomes, Eduardo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barreto, António S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silva, Marina F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fontes, Magda A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bessa, Rui J B</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lemos, José P C</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eating quality of “Vitela Tradicional do Montado”-PGI veal and Mertolenga-PDO veal and beef</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Meat Science</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beef</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">meat quality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mertolenga</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sensory analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Veal</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">94</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">63-68</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abstract Physicochemical and sensory characteristics were measured in veal and beef from the Portuguese Mertolenga breed having 3 quality labels as follows: Mertolenga-PDO beef and veal which apply to purebred animals and “Vitela Tradicional do Montado”-PGI veal which applies to crossbred animals. Measurements were made in longissimus lumborum muscle aged for 6 days. The temperature 3 h post-mortem (T3), cooking losses and Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) reflected carcass weight (CW) differences between groups. The pigment content was influenced by age, with beef having higher values than veal. WBSF correlated negatively with intramuscular fat in Mertolenga-PDO beef, but not on veal. WBSF correlated positively with cooking losses and negatively with myofibrillar fragmentation index, tenderness, juiciness and overall acceptability. Cooking losses and juiciness were the main contributors for the tenderness differences. Vitela Tradicional do Montado-PGI and Mertolenga-PDO veal had lighter colour and were considered tender. The three meat types were well discriminated based on pHu, a* and C* parameters by canonical discriminant analysis.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">a. C.G. Monteiro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fontes, M. a</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bessa, R. J. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prates, J. a M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lemos, J. P. C.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Intramuscular lipids of Mertolenga-PDO beef, Mertolenga-PDO veal and “Vitela Tradicional do Montado”-PGI veal</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Food Chemistry</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">a-tocopherol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beef</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cholesterol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CLA isomers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fatty acids</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">meat quality</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030881461101750X</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">132</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1486 - 1494</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Three quality branded meats (n = 68), ‘‘Vitela Tradicional do Montado’’-PGI veal, Mertolenga-PDO veal and Mertolenga-PDO beef were analysed for cholesterol (HPLC-UV), a-tocopherol (HPLC-FD), fatty acid composition (GC-FID), including conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomeric proﬁle (Ag + -HPLC), and nutritional value of lipids. All the meats analysed had similar contents (P &gt; 0.05) of cholesterol, a-tocopherol and intramuscular fat. In contrast, the percentage of 18:0 was lower for PGI veal, and that of 18:1 c9 was higher in PDO veal, whilst the percentage of 18:2 n6 was higher in PDO beef, relative to other two meats. The content of total CLA and the percentage of its t11,c13 isomer were higher, and the n6/ n3 ratio was lower, in PDO veal, relative to the other two meats. The data suggested that PGI veal has higher variability for most fatty acids than the other two types of meat. Finally, a discriminant analysis was conducted and the three meat types were well discriminated using the meat fatty acid proﬁle as variables.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The following values have no corresponding Zotero field:&lt;br/&gt;label: Beef;CLA isomers;Cholesterol;Fatty acids;Meat quality;a-Tocopherol</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alfaia, C M M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ribeiro, V S S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lourenço, M R a</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quaresma, M a G</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martins, S I V</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Portugal, a P V</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fontes, C M G a</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bessa, R J B</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Castro, M L F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prates, J a M</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomers and cholesterol in beef from crossbred bullocks intensively produced and from Alentejana purebred bullocks reared according to Carnalentejana-PDO specifications.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Meat science</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beef</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cholesterol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CLA isomers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fatty acids</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">meat quality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Production systems</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">72</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">425-436</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The purpose of this study was to characterise and compare the nutritional value of Portuguese Carnalentejana-PDO beef, obtained from Alentejana purebred bullocks reared in a semi-extensive system, with the meat from Alentejana×Charolais crossbred bullocks produced in a conventional intensive concentrate-based system. In addition, seasonal changes in Carnalentejana-PDO beef quality were assessed, by analysing meat samples from animals slaughtered in early autumn and late spring. The results showed that beef-PDO has different intramuscular fat characteristics in comparison with meat from crossbred bullocks fed intensively with concentrate. However, the finishing period of Alentejana purebred bullocks with concentrate seems to attenuate most of the typical grass-fed characteristics of meat fat. Nevertheless, from a human nutrition perspective, Carnalentejana-PDO beef seems to be healthier than that from intensively reared animals since it has a lower n-6/n-3 ratio, although always above the recommended guidelines for human diet, and higher proportions of c9,t11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomer and total CLA relative to saturated fatty acids plus total cholesterol (CLA/SFA+CHR). Furthermore, no seasonal variation in the nutritional quality of beef-PDO was apparent. Taken together, the data indicate that Carnalentejana-PDO beef is of greater nutritional value than intensively produced beef from crossbred bullocks throughout the year.</style></abstract><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22061726</style></accession-num></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alfaia, C. M. M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ribeiro, V. S. S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lourenço, M. R. a</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quaresma, M. a G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martins, S. I. V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Portugal, a P. V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fontes, C. M. G. a</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bessa, R. J. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Castro, M. L. F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prates, J. a M.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomers and cholesterol in beef from crossbred bullocks intensively produced and from Alentejana purebred bullocks reared according to Carnalentejana-PDO specifications.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Meat science</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beef</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cholesterol</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CLA isomers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fatty acids</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">meat quality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Production systems</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22061726</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">72</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">425 - 436</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The purpose of this study was to characterise and compare the nutritional value of Portuguese Carnalentejana-PDO beef, obtained from Alentejana purebred bullocks reared in a semi-extensive system, with the meat from Alentejana×Charolais crossbred bullocks produced in a conventional intensive concentrate-based system. In addition, seasonal changes in Carnalentejana-PDO beef quality were assessed, by analysing meat samples from animals slaughtered in early autumn and late spring. The results showed that beef-PDO has different intramuscular fat characteristics in comparison with meat from crossbred bullocks fed intensively with concentrate. However, the finishing period of Alentejana purebred bullocks with concentrate seems to attenuate most of the typical grass-fed characteristics of meat fat. Nevertheless, from a human nutrition perspective, Carnalentejana-PDO beef seems to be healthier than that from intensively reared animals since it has a lower n-6/n-3 ratio, although always above the recommended guidelines for human diet, and higher proportions of c9,t11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomer and total CLA relative to saturated fatty acids plus total cholesterol (CLA/SFA+CHR). Furthermore, no seasonal variation in the nutritional quality of beef-PDO was apparent. Taken together, the data indicate that Carnalentejana-PDO beef is of greater nutritional value than intensively produced beef from crossbred bullocks throughout the year.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The following values have no corresponding Zotero field:&lt;br/&gt;accession-num: 22061726</style></notes></record></records></xml>