<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>7</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mosquera-Losada, M R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moreno, G</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pardini, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">McAdam, J H</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papanastasis, V</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Burgess, P J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamersdorf, N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Castro, M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liagre, F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nair, P K Ramachandran</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Garrity, Dennis</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Past, Present and Future of Agroforestry Systems in Europe</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Agroforestry - The Future of Global Land Use SE - 16</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">environmental services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silvoarable</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silvopasture</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer Netherlands</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">285--312 LA -- English</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">978-94-007-4675-6</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Many traditional land-use systems in Europe involved agroforestry in the pre-industrial era, but, over the years, increased mechanization led to the develop- ment of increasingly specialized crop, animal and wood production systems. As a consequence, the area under agroforestry declined in many regions of Europe, and agroforestry systems became con fi ned to situations where understorey primary production is restricted due to cold temperatures (Boreal and Alpine areas) or drought (Mediterranean areas) and to plots that are hard to reach or too small for cultivation with modern machinery, as in Spain, Italy and the lower altitude mountain regions in southern and central Germany. On the whole, agroforestry continued to be practised only where it enabled farmers to obtain economic returns from lands that were otherwise relatively unproductive and mostly limited to silvopastoral practices. Since the mid-1990s, however, European policies have encouraged land management systems that combine production, environmental services (biodiversity, carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and water quality) and social bene fi ts, and this has created a new interest in agroforestry systems. Today, the major agroforestry practices in Europe include silvopasture and silvoarable. However, the bene fi ts and opportunities offered by agroforestry can only be realized with substantial investments and coordinated efforts in research, education, knowledge transfer and appropriate national policies across Europe.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">a.R. Graves</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Burgess, P.J. J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palma, J.H.N. H N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Herzog, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moreno, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bertomeu, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dupraz, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liagre, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keesman, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van der Werf, W.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Nooy, a. Koeffeman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van den Briel, J.P. P</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Graves, a.R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Burgess, P.J. J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palma, J.H.N. H N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Herzog, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moreno, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bertomeu, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dupraz, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liagre, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keesman, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van der Werf, W.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Nooy, a. Koeffeman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van den Briel, J.P. P</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecological Engineering</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Agroforestry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arable</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biophysical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Farm-SAFE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forestry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Modelling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poplar</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silvoarable</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Temperate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Walnut</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yield-SAFE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">434-449</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silvoarable agroforestry could promote use of trees on farms in Europe, but its likely effect on production, farm proﬁtability, and environmental services is poorly understood. Hence, from 2001 to 2005, the Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe project developed a systematic process to evaluate the biophysical and economic performance of arable, forestry, and silvoarable systems in Spain, France, and The Netherlands. A biophysical model called “Yield-SAFE” was developed to predict long-term yields for the different systems and local statistics and expert opinion were used to derive their revenue, costs, and pre- and post-2005 grant regimes. These data were then used in an economic model called “Farm-SAFE” to predict plot- and farm-scale proﬁtability. Land equivalent ratios were greater than one, showing Yield-SAFE predicted that growing trees and crops in silvoarable systems was more productive than growing them separately. Pre-2005 grants in Spain and The Netherlands penalised silvoarable systems, but post-2005 grants were more equitable. In France, walnut and poplar silvoarable systems were consistently the most proﬁtable system under both grant regimes. In Spain, holm oak and stone pine silvoarable systems were the least proﬁtable system under pre-2005 grants, but only marginally less proﬁtable than arable systems under post-2005 grants. In The Netherlands, low timber values and the opportunity cost of losing arable land for slurry manure application made silvoarable and forestry systems uncompetitive with arable systems under both grant regimes.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">a. R. Graves</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Burgess, P. J. J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palma, J. H. N. H. N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Herzog, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moreno, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bertomeu, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dupraz, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liagre, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keesman, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van der Werf, W.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Nooy, a Koeffeman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van den Briel, J. P. P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Graves, a R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Burgess, P. J. J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palma, J. H. N. H. N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Herzog, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moreno, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bertomeu, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dupraz, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liagre, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keesman, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van der Werf, W.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Nooy, a Koeffeman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van den Briel, J. P. P.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecological Engineering</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Agroforestry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arable</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biophysical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Farm-SAFE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forestry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Modelling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poplar</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silvoarable</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Temperate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Walnut</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yield-SAFE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925857406002333</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">434 - 449</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silvoarable agroforestry could promote use of trees on farms in Europe, but its likely effect on production, farm proﬁtability, and environmental services is poorly understood. Hence, from 2001 to 2005, the Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe project developed a systematic process to evaluate the biophysical and economic performance of arable, forestry, and silvoarable systems in Spain, France, and The Netherlands. A biophysical model called “Yield-SAFE” was developed to predict long-term yields for the different systems and local statistics and expert opinion were used to derive their revenue, costs, and pre- and post-2005 grant regimes. These data were then used in an economic model called “Farm-SAFE” to predict plot- and farm-scale proﬁtability. Land equivalent ratios were greater than one, showing Yield-SAFE predicted that growing trees and crops in silvoarable systems was more productive than growing them separately. Pre-2005 grants in Spain and The Netherlands penalised silvoarable systems, but post-2005 grants were more equitable. In France, walnut and poplar silvoarable systems were consistently the most proﬁtable system under both grant regimes. In Spain, holm oak and stone pine silvoarable systems were the least proﬁtable system under pre-2005 grants, but only marginally less proﬁtable than arable systems under post-2005 grants. In The Netherlands, low timber values and the opportunity cost of losing arable land for slurry manure application made silvoarable and forestry systems uncompetitive with arable systems under both grant regimes.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue></record></records></xml>