Which habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices?

TitleWhich habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices?
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsHalada, L., Evans D., Romão C., & Petersen J-E.
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume20
Issue11
Pagination2365 - 2378
Date Published2011///
KeywordsAgricultural management, Favourable conservation status, Grazing, Habitats directive, High Nature Value Farmland, Mowing, Natura 2000, Ostermann list
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify the habitat types listed in the Habitats Directive Annex I that require low-intensity agricultural management for their existence. We assessed the link between the Annex I habitat types and agricultural practices in order to identify habitat types that depend on the continuation of agricultural practices or whose existence is prolonged or spatially enlarged via blocking or reducing the secondary succession by agricultural activities. 63 habitat types that depend on or which can profit from agricultural activities—mainly grazing and mowing—were identified. They are classified into 2 groups: (1) habitats fully dependent on the continuation of agricultural management; (2) habitats partly dependent on the continuation of agricultural management. This paper also briefly discusses habitat types for which either doubts remain on their dependence on agricultural management, or the relation to extensive farming practices exists only in part of their area of distribution in Europe or under certain site conditions, respectively. Assessments of the conservation status of habitats of European Importance by 25 EU Member States in 2007 showed that habitats identified by us as depending on agricultural practices had a worse status than non-agricultural habitats.

URLhttp://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10531-011-9989-z